August 2004 USFA Rule Changes
In July, the USFA Board of Directors adopted many rule changes effective starting with the 2004-2005 fencing
year. These rule changes were all modeled after changes the FIE had previously made in its rules, and
and published. But, the USFA has yet to make this information available at its Web site.
Now all (instead of some) first group offenses which involve the scoring of a touch, where the person
committing the offense has some sort of advantage due to the offense, result in the annulment of that touch
as well as the penalty. This change involved "simple corps-à-corps (foil and sabre)", "touching/taking hold
of electrical equipment", and "covering/substitution of valid target".
Referees: You no longer have to look at the penalty chart to see if there
is an asterisk next to a first group offense. If it is still a first group offense, and if you would ever
want to know if a point should be annulled, the asterisk will be there without needing to check.
NOTE: "Covering/substitution of valid target" appears in the rules in one place for saber which has no
counterpart in the discussion of foil (rule t.72). The change of the rules for this extra occurrence is
causing some confusion. The list of revisions quotes the whole paragraph with the change, including the
already-existing mention that in saber off-target hits are non-events. But, due to where this changed text
appears in the list of changes, many people have mistakenly thought that it applies to foil, and have been
surprised about the (existing!) wording saying off-target hits are non-events. Although there has been
discussion of making such a change in foil, last time it went to a vote (the FIE late last year), it was
defeated. The white light in foil is very much still with us despite the confused mistakes about the
revised text of this saber rule.
Reversing the line of shoulders is no longer an offense (it never was in épée), and watching
for this is no longer something for judges to do. However, nothing about this makes it legal to cover
target with your off arm, and turning back is still illegal.
Judges (the assesserus who assist the referee) always had to switch ends between periods of DE
bouts, so the same judges don't always watch the same fencer. Now, this switching also happens between
bouts of a team match too, so the same judges don't always watch the same half of the
fencers (ignoring what happens with lefties).
It is illegal for the fencer to have electronic communications equipment which, e.g., would
allow his coach to whisper into his ear during the bout. The penalty to the fencer for doing this is
the same fourth group black card as any other clearly deliberate cheating with equipment.
Referees: In the pre-bout equipment checks, add looking for electronic
communications equipment to your standard routine. If and when the referee discovers such, confiscate it
and turn it over to the technical experts just as you would a weapon which might have been rigged for
cheating. To remember this, just remember that you is supposed to act on his own when things don't work
or break, but you are supposed to get the experts involved when there is a reasonable possibility that
there is willful and intentional violation of rules about materials in an attempt to cheat. Something
which could be either a hearing aid or a one-way radio counts as something which has a reasonable but
not certain possibility of being willful and intentional cheating.
The penalty for absence of a satisfactory name or national colors on the clothing (in such
tournaments where there is a requirement) is now a second group offense (immediately and always a red
card), but only one such card for the offense and the bout may then proceed using the equipment.
Referees: In the few tournaments which actually require a name on
clothing, you can stop overlooing the rule because you feel sorry for fencers who have no way to comply. Now
they can fence anyway, even after you award the required red card.
The rules concerning calling a fencer, or the balance of a team, to strip have been
revised. There is no longer a yellow card for absence at the first call, but it is now sufficient for the
referee to make all calls for the missing fencer (instead of there being "an announcement").
Referees: When a fencer is missing, call the fencer but don't get out
the cards. You will no longer find this listed as a first group offense. Your call at the strip for
the fencer is sufficient. You no longer have to get the bout
committee to make a general announcement. When the fencer is not present at the third call, then use the
black card. However, it may be wise to use your judgment. The bout committee expects you to be as efficient
as possible. But, if the bout committee itself has not done an adequate job of making accurate information
available to the fencers about where and when they are due, it might be prudent to involve the bout committee
instead of penalizing a fencer who might end up winning an appeal.
Saluting is now required both before and after the bout, in addition to a handshake after
the bout. Failure to do any of this results in suspension continuing for the next two competitions.
Referees: You no longer need to remember how the penalities differ for
failure to salute beforehand, failure of the winner to salute, and failure of the loser to salute -- all have
the same extremely harsh variety of black card. But, the USFA used to allow the handshake as a substitute for
a salute afterward, while now both are required. Try to avoid giving this black card if a fencer is being
genuinely forgetful, and reserve it for genuine refusal. This particular kind of black card will require
reporting the offense to USFA authorities.
Passivity is handled slightly differently. Old version: Pools and non-final DE
periods, verbal warning, then end the period, skip the break, and resume fencing (which is hard
to do with a pool!), and if in the final period, determine priority just in case and fence for
one whole minute (or until one reaches the score limit). New version: In everything but pools,
final periods of DEs, and last bouts of team matches, no warning, but skip to the end of the
current DE period or end of the current bout in a team match. For pools, final DE periods, and
final team bouts, first warn, then jump to the final minute with priority determined in advance
just in case. And, passivity when already in the final minute is ignored.
Referees: Remember it this way. If passivity happens in
ANY situation when the upcoming time expiration DOES NOT produce a final score, just pretend time
expired already. If passivity happens in ANY situation when the upcoming time expiration DOES produce
a final score, then 1) if it is too late to advance to one minute remaining, ignore, and 2) if it is
still possible to advance to one minute remaining, issue a warning the first time and the second time
advance to the one minute point with priority determined in advance just in case. (Y10 and Y12 DE
bouts, which are best two out of three encounter bouts, which were not explicitly addressed.)
Referees: Note that you do not have to watch 30 seconds of dead air time
before invoking passivity. If the two fencers somehow make it clear to you that they're not interested in
engaging each other (like dropping their arms and backing away from the en garde lines, or even speaking
of the desire to be passive), that suffices.
Penalizing people not fencing in the bout for disturbing the bout has changed slightly. Warnings
and expulsions are the same as before, but whether or not to use a card at all, and which card if so, has
been clarified. The warning uses a yellow card, and the expulsion uses a black card.
A deliberate touch not on valid target has been moved on the penalty chart from a first group
to a second group offense (i.e., you don't get one free deliberate non-target hit any more).
|