|
||||
|
Gulf Coast Division The special meeting of the membership was called to order at 1:15 PM by USFA representative Donald Alperstein, assisted by Gerrie Baumgart (a member of the USFA Board of Directors) at the Courtyard Houston Near The Galleria at 3131 West Loop South, Houston. The meeting had been called by Donald Alperstein under authority delegated by the USFA Board of Directors to intervene in the affairs of the Gulf Coast Texas Division. The announced reason for the meeting was "to conduct the Gulf Coast division in the current year's election and the adoption of by-laws to comply with USFA requirements". Division Chairman Louise Lepie was present, but the meeting (held under direct USFA intervention instead of under the Bylaws of the Division) was not chaired by the Division Chairman. The Secretary was not present, but notes were taken by more than one person on his behalf. At the meeting began, 26 voting members were present in person. The chair noted that 106 proxies had been submitted to him in the required fashion. 92 of the proxies were valid. Seven were from people who were not voting members of the Division. Two were invalidated by receipt of a later valid proxy from the same person, two were received later than the deadline, one was not signed, and two were questionable because they were from people with names not clearly matching those of voting Division members. By general consent, there was a motion to accept the two questionable proxies as validly conferring votes to the parties named on the proxies. Acceptable statements were offered that the proxies were issued by known voting members of the Division whose USFA memberships were valid but in a different name. The motion to accept the two proxies passed. The chair noted that seven people were named by unlimited proxies, i.e., proxies entitling them to cast votes as they saw fit, specifically Giorgio Bassa (1), Frank Berntsen (1), Rachel El-Saleh (11), Andrey Geva (10), Louise Lepie (61), August Skopik (1), and Nicole Trojanowski (1). The chair also noted that three people were named by limited proxies, i.e., proxies specifying how votes should be cast for elections, but allowing the bearers to vote as they saw fit for Bylaws matters, specifically Andrey Geva (4), August Skopik (3), and John Trojanowski (1). Colored cards, one color per election contest, were distributed for voters present in person and bearers of unlimited proxies. Nominations were opened for people to act as tellers under the supervision of Gerrie Baumgart. Kathy Bone and Rebecca El-Saleh were nominated. Those three tellers were accepted by the assembly. The chair asked for nominations for the office of Chairman. Louise Lepie and Bill Trapani were nominated. The assembly closed nominations. The vote was Lepie 91, Trapani 27. Louise Lepie was declared the winner. The chair asked for nominations for the office of Vice Chairman. Jerry Dunaway and Alexander Popovici were nominated. The assembly closed nominations. The vote was Dunaway 71, Popovici 46. Jerry Dunaway was declared the winner. The chair asked the assembly if it wished to decide to merge the offices of Secretary and Treasurer for the coming year, as described as allowed under the old Bylaws. John Trojanowski moved that the offices not be combined for 2005-2006. Marty Wysocki seconded the motion. The motion passed without objection. The chair asked for nominations for the office of Secretary. During nominations, Marty Wysocki made clear that, although is name had formerly been associated with candidacy for the office, he had previously withdrawn his name. Matt Delevoryas and August Skopik were nominated. The assembly closed nominations. The vote was Delevoryas 81, Skopik 34. Matt Delevoryas was declared the winner. Giorgio Bassa moved that the already selected tellers be retained as tellers for the election of Treasurer. John Trojanowski seconded the motion. The motion passed without objection. The chair asked for nominations for Treasurer. Tom Bone and Rachel El-Saleh were nominated. The assembly closed nominations. The vote was El-Saleh 87, Bone 31. Rachel El-Saleh was declared the winner. By general consent, the assembly recessed for five minutes. The chair reconvened the meeting. He announced that there existed voting members who wished to leave the meeting, and wanted to know if they could execute proxies. The chair explained that by the rules under which the meeting had been convened, the answer was "no" because all proxies were specified as having to be received by a deadline. However, he offered the matter to the assembly to decide. John Trojanowski moved to allow people who have appeared in person to depart the meeting and leave a proxy. Sinclair Oubre seconded the motion. After debate, the motion passed. The chair asked that anyone leaving the meeting write out a proxy on any sheet of paper before departing, giving name, the name of the person who would hold the proxy, and if there were any restrictions on how to cast votes. The chair introduced the next order of business, the election of Congressional representatives. He stated that informal calculations had just determined that the Division was entitled to eight Congressional representatives, provided the Division actually consisted of 585 members (as the 2004-2005 year ended). The Division Chairman stated that the Division had been notified by the National Office that it was entitled to nine representatives. The chair advised that the Division elect an excess number, e.g., 10, with the highest-finishing candidates being the representatives, in whatever number proved to be correct, and any additional candidates being alternates in the order of votes received. Were there few nominations, e.g., five, an election would be unnecessary, but there would exist unfilled seats which could optionally be filled on a later occasion. He further advised that, when the next Congress approached, the Division consider having resignations and elections to fill empty positions to best adjust the representatives to their ability to attend the Congress. The chair announced that, in random order. August Skopik, Andrey Geva, and Stephen Moss had all already received votes (from limited proxies). The chair entertained additional nominations. Nominations and seconds were received for Bill Trapani, Marty Wysocki, Suzanne Simpson, Rachel El-Saleh, Tom Bone, John Trojanowski, Manuel Rodriguez, and Nicole Trojanowski. A point of order was raised about the exact method of casting votes in view of the multiple offices needing filling, and what that meant for the limited proxies with instructions to vote for certain people. The chair indicated that that was a meaningful question to this election, and would need to be settled by the assembly. By general consent, nominations were closed. The chair suggested that all voters be entitled to vote for eight names of candidates, possibly required to be different or possibly allowed to be the same. The chair entertained and received a motion and second that ballots allow (up to) eight names to receive votes. The motion passed. The chair entertained and received a motion that votes be cumulative, i.e., that one name could receive more than one of the eight votes allowed on each ballot. In response to a question, the Chairman indicated that those casting a large number of votes could just specify how the total of eight votes per person times the number of people being represented be apportioned among candidates. The motion passed with an indeterminate large number of votes for, and eleven votes against. A motion was made and seconded to recess for five minutes. By general consent, the motion passed. The chair reconvened the meeting, with cards distributed for use as ballots for Congressional representatives. As the last of the ballots were being prepared, the chair announced the next order of business was adopting of new Bylaws. The chair acknowledged that the "bylaw committee" had worked to prepare a complete draft Bylaws and suggested a representative of the bylaw committee speak about them. The chair asked the assembly whether it indeed to adopt Bylaws part by part, or adopt a complete set of Bylaws in one action. Andrey Geva moved to postpone all action to adopt Bylaws until some future time. Giorgio Bassa seconded the motion. The chair clarified that this would allow discussion of Bylaws, and such discussion almost certainly would occur, but would terminate with a vote to adopt Bylaws occurring on some later occasion. After discussion, some expressed a desire to table this motion until after the Bylaw discussion had occurred, and Patrick Gremillion so moved. The chair indicated it would instead be proper instead to defeat the current main motion, and propose it anew after the Bylaw discussion had occurred. With no further debate, the motion failed by a vote of 29 for, and an uncounted number equal to or greater than 61 against. The chair again asked about whether to vote on Bylaws by part or only as a whole. Greg Micek moved to vote on Bylaws only as a whole. The motion was seconded. After no debate, the motion passed. The chair entertained Rachel El-Saleh speaking on behalf of the bylaw committee, who explained the understandings and motivations of the bylaw committee in crafting the specific proposed Bylaws they had brought to the Division. (The Bylaws offered by the bylaw committee appear as Appendix I.) She explained in particular detail how the portion dealing with allocation and division sanctioning of tournaments was crafted. The understanding of the assembly was that the Bylaw draft offered by the bylaw committee would eventually be moved for adoption as a whole, but before that would occur, the assembly might entertain motions to make changes to that draft. The assembly had substantial discussion within itself and with the chair about how to entertain the proposed Bylaws, whether to start with the beginning, or with the relatively non-controversial portions first, or with the most controversial portions first. The chair advised starting with the beginning, which was not controversial. Sinclair Oubre moved to refer for a vote Article XI in the form proposed by the bylaw committee. The motion was seconded. Considerable debate ensued, speaking for the proposed article, speaking against it, and advocating specific changes to it. Included in this debate was discussion of whether the draft ought to be stating that the Division Bout Committee (later to be renamed Division Tournament Committee) representative sent to a tournament should be described as being the chairman of the bout committee of that tournament. The assembly was quite clear that the representative should not be empowered to run the tournament (which is exactly the definition of the chairman of the bout committee). No formal motion was made, but implicitly the assembly by general consent suspended the rules to allow its immediate consideration, then resolved that that language was incorrect, then returned to the original main motion. Eventually, by general consent the motion failed and the assembly began making motions addressing specific portions of the Article. For the entire rest of the meeting, the assembly made motions which literally were phrased is if adopting actual Bylaw text, or general descriptions of requirements for the Bylaw text, but these motions were always understood to be abbreviations for making changes to the draft which would eventually be proposed for adoption at the end of the meeting. Suzanne Simpson moved to change "Division Bout Committee" to "Division Tournament Committee" throughout the draft Bylaws. Kathy Bone seconded the motion. The motion passed without objection. Andrey Geva moved to change the draft Bylaws to specify that the Division Tournament Committee be composed of three members from each USFA member club in the Division, and that the Tournament Committee representative for each tournament be selected by lot, not including representatives from hosting club. Marty Wysocki seconded the motion. After discussion, Greg Micek moved to amend the motion to specify that the Division Tournament Committee shall include one member from each USFA member club chosen by that club and be charged with determining how to staff all Division USFA sanctioned tournaments and competitions. After some discussion, the chair recommended that the language instead be similar to that all competitions sanctioned by the Division shall be run by USFA rules, and that the Tournament Committee is responsible for ensuring compliance of each tournament and competition, and responsible for ensuring proper staffing of each tournament, and that the Tournament Committee be composed of one member from each USFA member club chosen by that club. By general consent, the motion to amend was considered to be so worded. The motion to amend passed without objection. The chair restated that the motion then on the floor was: The applicable portions of the Bylaws provide that all competitions sanctioned by the Division shall be run pursuant to the rules and regulations for fencing competitions promulgated by the USFA. The Division Tournament Committee shall be responsible for insuring compliance with that principle. The Division Tournament Committee shall be composed of one representative from each USFA member club located in the Division, which representative shall be selected by that club. In addition, the Tournament Committee shall be responsible for insuring proper staffing of each tournament. The motion passed without objection. Andrey Geva moved that the draft specify that if a tournament is held and a member of the Division Tournament Committee does not show up, that does not cause decertification. Kathy Bone seconded the motion. After discussion, the motion passed without objection. Marty Wysocki moved that the Division Tournament Committee shall from its membership elect its chair. John Trojanowski seconded the motion. After brief discussion, the motion passed without objection. Greg Micek moved that the (proposed) Bylaw be amended so that after the number of available weekends has been determined, that number shall be divided by the number of USFA member clubs in the Division to determine the allotment of tournaments to each club, and any date that is not taken on the calendar by some specific cut-off date early in the season will then be filled from the remaining applications by the Tournament Committee. John Trojanowski seconded the motion. After extensive debate, a vote was taken and the motion failed. August Skopik moved: "to allow the Tournament Committee to be arbiter of the tournament schedule, and each USFA club will be assigned from the available dates a number of tournaments that they have first priority on. Not tournament dates, competition dates, that they have first priority on. By a, what did we use [unintelligible] before ...." (The remainder of the motion is not available.) However, the question, as put to the assembly by the chair, as the moved and seconded motion to be debated, was differently phrased, having been shaped by considerable discussion of appropriate wording to express what the mover was attempting to enact. The question put to the assembly was that the Tournament Committee will determine the number of available dates, will divide the number of available dates by the number of USFA member clubs in the Division, and then will randomly draw lots to determine the order of scheduling preferred in rotation. Sinclair Oubre moved to amend the motion to specify that each USFA member club in the Division be given one exclusive protected weekend. It became clear that the assembly desired to have a lottery, and each club gets one guaranteed weekend. Thereafter, remaining days somehow get sorted out by the Division Tournament Committee in a way where multiple tournaments could occur on the same day but conflicting competitions within them would not be allowed. By general consent, the motions then on the floor were considered to have failed, John Trojanowski moved this, and the motion was seconded. Rachel El-Saleh requested that the motion be amended to specify that a lottery would be used to resolve conflicts only after the Tournament Division Committee failed to resolve the conflict through negotiation. With the consent of the maker and the seconder of the motion on the floor, by general consent the assembly considered the main motion so amended. The main motion was then agreed by general consent to be that each club gets one guaranteed weekend, with conflicts unable to be resolved by negotiation being resolved by lottery, and that thereafter the number of still-available days will be divided by the number of USFA member clubs in the division to determine the expected ratio of additional days to clubs, but then additional days would be allocated by lottery in a way where multiple tournaments could occur on the same day but conflicting competitions within them would not be allowed, with days being allocated until either the calendar is full or no club seeks additional days. Sinclair Oubre moved the previous question, and it was seconded. By general consent, the previous question was presumed to have passed. After some additional discussion over the text of the main motion, it was restated to specify that the number of available weekends would be determined, one weekend would go exclusively to each USFA member club resorting to the lottery in case negotiation cannot resolve conflicts, and thereafter the remaining dates would be claimed by clubs rotating in lottery order where conflicting tournaments would be permitted but conflicting events would not, continuing until either the calendar is full or no club seeks additional days. The motion passed without objection. Steve Moss moved that the calendar be published by Labor Day, and the Tournament Committee adopt whatever procedures are necessary to assure the calendar will be published in a timely fashion. John Trojanowski seconded the motion. After brief discussion, the motion passed without objection. Marty Wysocki cited allegations that some of the draft Bylaw texts disturbed Donald Alperstein as potentially problematic or illegal, and wondered what mechanism there might be to learn of such impending problems other than after already enacting flawed text. Donald Alperstein reported, in brief: Article VI, Executive Committee, he advised that the meetings, to be held "... at such time and place ..." also should specify "... and by such method, in person or otherwise ...". Also, the allowance for waiver of notice by the quorum present should instead be waiver of notice by all entitled to such notice. August Skopik moved to make such changes, and Giorgio Bassa seconded the motion. There was no discussion, and the motion passed. Article IX, Section 6 about contested elections, subsection 10 said that for three or more candidates with no majority received, a runoff should occur immediately with the winner elected, but the technical details of the meaning of this were missing. Rachel El-Saleh moved that there be a runoff between the top two candidates, and John Trojanowski seconded the motion. After some discussion, it was suggested that instead it be between such top candidates as represent at least 50% of the votes cast, and any candidates tied with them. With the consent of the original maker and seconder, the assembly by general consent considered the motion so amended. As amended, the motion passed. Article XI, Section 3, appeared to imply but not require that the tournament calendar be published. It was noted that earlier changes in the meeting had introduced explicit mention that the calendar be published by Labor Day. Article X, Amendments, Donald Alperstein cited Gerrie Baumgart as having recommended that 15 days is insufficient notice for a vote to amend Bylaws, and 30 was recommended. Marty Wysocki so moved, and August Skopik seconded the motion. Without discussion, the motion passed without objection. Marty Wysocki moved to accept the draft Bylaws as amended. The motion was seconded. By general consent, this was assumed to include authorizing the bylaw committee to prepare actual wording for such portions of the draft Bylaws for which the assembly has passed motions stating the philosophy which needed to be embodied in the Bylaws but not specifying actual wording. After discussion, the motion passed without objection. Marty Wysocki requested that the minutes of the meeting express the thanks of the Division to Donald Alperstein and Gerrie Baumgart in appreciation for their efforts, and that the assembly thanks those who put in tremendous work preparing the draft Bylaws. For the election of Congressional representatives, the candidates were announced to have received votes in the order Rachel El-Saleh, Suzanne Simpson, Bill Trapani, August Skopik, both John and Nicole Trojanowski, Manuel Rodriguez, Andrey Geva, Stephen Moss, Marty Wysocki, and Tom Bone. The chair solicited a motion to destroy the ballots. John Trojanowski so moved. Louise Lepie seconded the motion. The motion passed. The chair praised the assembly at its unexpected productivity in the meeting, and admonished the assembly to continue the momentum. He also suggested that the Division is huge, but the Division is underrepresented in terms of referees, bout committee presence at a national level, Congress, and Board of Directors, and that the Division can and should address this. A motion to adjourn was moved and seconded. The motion passed without opposition. The meeting adjourned at 5:10 PM.
Matt Delevoryas, Appendix I The Bylaws Proposed by the Bylaws Committee PREAMBLEThese Bylaws, revised in 2005, do hereby supersede, supplant and otherwise replace any previous bylaws, amendments or other rules whereby the Gulf Coast TX Division has been governed. In the event of conflict between these Bylaws and the USFA Bylaws, the latter shall take precedence and the former shall be considered amended accordingly. In these bylaws, the term "he" or "him" shall apply to all persons regardless of gender. "Membership" shall mean all individual members in good standing of THE DIVISION. ARTICLE I - NAME AND ORGANIZATIONSection 1: Name.The name of the division shall be THE GULF COAST TX DIVISION of the UNITED STATES FENCING ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED. THE GULF COAST TX DIVISION shall hereinafter be referred to as "THE DIVISION", and the UNITED STATES FENCING ASSOCIATION shall be referred to as the "USFA". THE DIVISION is the responsible entity for the organization and supervision of fencing within its geographical area. THE DIVISION is a duly chartered subordinate, constituent body of the USFA, exercising powers given by, performing duties directed under, and subject to, the Charter and Bylaws of the USFA, with jurisdiction over the following geographic area: Section 2: Geographic Area.Beginning at the mouth of the Sabine River, at the Texas-Louisiana border, thence extending west down the Texas Gulf Coast to the Mexican Border, thence west following the Mexican-Texas border to the junction of US Highway 77, thence northward following US Highway 77 to the point where it is intersected by the 31st parallel of latitude, thence east following the 31st parallel to the Texas-Louisiana border, thence southward following the Texas-Louisiana Border to the mouth of the Sabine River. The foregoing geographic area is the historic and approved area for THE DIVISION. It shall not exclude any offshore developments in the Gulf of Mexico nor waive any claim to jurisdiction thereto. ARTICLE II - OBJECTIVESThe objectives of THE DIVISION shall be:
ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIPSection 1: Eligibility.Any USFA member residing in THE DIVISION, or belonging to a registered fencing club located within the area of THE DIVISION, shall be eligible for membership in THE DIVISION. No member of this Division may be a member of any other Division of the USFA. Section 2: Classes.The membership of THE DIVISION shall be divided into classes as established from time to time by the Board of Directors of the USFA. Members of each class shall possess such rights and be subject to such regulations as the Board of Directors of the USFA may determine. Section 3: Rights of Members to Compete and Vote.
Section 4: Membership Year.The membership year shall commence on August 1st and end on the following July 31st. All dues are payable on application for membership to the USFA. Section 5: Discipline and Grievances.With the exception of disciplinary penalties associated with competitions, all other matters pertaining to the discipline, suspension and expulsion of members and any grievances submitted by members shall be referred to the Board of Directors of the USFA for appropriate action. Section 6: Non-Discrimination.Membership in THE DIVISION shall be allowed without regard to race, color, religion, national origin or sex. ARTICLE IV - OFFICERSSection 1: Officers and Terms of Office.At the Annual Meeting of THE DIVISION there shall be elected a Chair, a Vice Chair, a Secretary and a Treasurer (or Secretary-Treasurer). All officers shall take office August 1st next following their election, and shall hold office until the following July 31st, or until their successors are elected and have qualified. Section 2: Qualifications for Officers.Only voting members of THE DIVISION may hold office in THE DIVISION. Section 3: Chair.The Chair shall:
Section 4: Vice Chair.The Vice Chair shall:
Section 5: Secretary.The Secretary shall:
Section 6: Treasurer.The Treasurer shall:
Section 7: Combined Offices.The office of Secretary and Treasurer may be combined for any year upon majority vote of the members of THE DIVISION voting, in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. In the event of such vote, the candidates for the office of Secretary and the office of Treasurer shall be deemed candidates for the combined office. Section 8: Removal of Officers.Officers of THE DIVISION may be removed for cause. The Board of Directors or Bylaws of the USFA may prescribe procedures for removal that provide the accused officer with notice of the asserted grounds for removal and due process during the removal proceedings. If the Board of Directors or Bylaws of the USFA fail to adopt such procedures, the USFA Executive Committee may remove an officer of THE DIVISION if it finds there is cause for such removal after notice to the accused officer and a hearing or other appropriate proceeding in which that officer was accorded due process rights. Section 9: Vacancies in Office.A vacancy in the office of Chair, whether arising from resignation, death, removal or otherwise, shall be filled by the Vice Chair. All other vacancies in offices of THE DIVISION, whether arising from resignation, death, removal or otherwise, shall be filled by appointment by the remaining members of the Executive Committee. In filling vacancies, the Executive Committee may appoint any member eligible to hold office. ARTICLE V - DIVISION ADVISORY FORUMSection 1: Purpose.The purpose of the Advisory Forum shall be provide an opportunity for members to meet, present and discuss ideas, interests and concerns that are pertinent to THE DIVISION and that may be considered by the Executive Committee. Section 2: Notification and Quorum.
Section 3: Meetings.
ARTICLE VI - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEESection 1: Composition.The Executive Committee shall be composed of the Chair, the Vice Chair, the Secretary, and the Treasurer of THE DIVISION. Section 2: Responsibilities and Powers.The Executive Committee shall be vested with the full powers and responsibility for the management and policies of THE DIVISION subject to these Bylaws. Section 3: Quorum.At any meeting of the Executive Committee, a quorum shall consist of three (3) members. On failure of a quorum, a lesser number shall have the power to adjourn to a given time and place. The Chair shall designate the date, place and time of each meeting. Section 4: Meetings.The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Executive Committee. Executive Committee Meetings shall be held at such time and place as shall be designated by the Chair and shall be called upon the written request of two (2) or more members of the Committee. All members shall be given not less than forty-eight (48) hours prior notice of all meetings unless such notice is waived by the quorum present. Any member of the Executive Committee may participate in a meeting by telephone unless another member participating in the meeting objects. The Divisional Executive Committee shall schedule meetings at no less than the following times:
Section 5: Action on Advisory Forum Matters.Any proposed suggestions from the Advisory Forum may be included on the agenda for the next Executive Committee meeting. The Executive Committee shall take such action as it deems appropriate, which action may include adoption, adoption with conditions, rejection or tabling. Actions on suggestions shall be recorded in the Executive Committee Meeting Minutes. Section 6: Electronic Mail.Any specific question or matter that might be discussed at an Executive Committee Meeting may be submitted to the Executive Committee by electronic means. Section 7: Operations Manual.The Executive Committee may maintain an Operations Manual to provide information about the policies, procedures and operations of THE DIVISION. ARTICLE VII - COMMITTEESSection 1: Committees.Except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws, the Executive Committee shall have the power to create such standing and special committees as they may deem necessary or appropriate, appoint the chairs thereof, and assign functions thereto. The members of committees need not be members of the Executive Committee. With the exception of the Webmaster Committee and the Division Bout Committee, any other committee shall be optional at the discretion of the Executive Committee. The committees are as follows:
Section 2: Committee Meetings.Every committee shall meet from time to time at the call of the Chair thereof, and it shall be the duty of the Chair to call a meeting upon the written request of a majority of the members of his committee or of the Division Chair. Section 3: Committee Reports.The Division Chair may request reports from the Committee Chairs from time to time. ARTICLE VIII - DIVISION MEETINGS AND NOTICESSection 1: Annual Meeting.There shall be an Annual Meeting of THE DIVISION held in the same location as the Divisional Qualifiers for Summer Nationals. A quorum shall consist of seven (7) voting members present in person or by proxy. The meeting shall convene immediately following the completion of the first day of fencing for the Divisional Qualifiers.
Section 2: Notice of Annual Meeting.Notice of the Annual Meeting shall be given to all voting members of THE DIVISION, which notice shall be sent, either by postal delivery or e-mail, and published on a Division Web site not less than fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting. Section 3: Special Meetings.Special Meetings of THE DIVISION may be called by the Chair at a time and place of relative convenience for the membership, and shall be called by the Chair upon written request of not less than twenty percent (20%) of Division voting membership or fifty (50) Division voting members, whichever is greater. For a special meeting requested by the voting members of THE DIVISION, the Chair shall call the meeting for a time soon enough to accommodate the business intended for the meeting. A quorum shall consist of seven (7) voting members present in person or by proxy. Business not specified in the notice of any such meeting shall not be acted upon.
Section 4: Notice of Special Meetings.Notice of Special Meetings shall be given to all voting members of THE DIVISION by the Secretary, which notice shall be sent, either by postal delivery or e-mail, and published on a Division Web site not less than fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting and shall contain a statement on the purpose of the meeting. Such notice shall include or be accompanied by the text of any amendment to these Bylaws to be acted upon at such Special Meeting, or a notice of where on a Web site on the internet the text of the proposed amendments may be viewed, provided, however, that if the text of the proposed amendments is not included with the notice, the notice shall include a statement that a copy of such text may be obtained by mail on submission of a written request. Section 5: Notices to Last Known Address.Any notices shall be deemed validly given or delivered if mailed to a member at the address on file with the USFA. Section 6: Procedures at Meetings.Unless otherwise provided for in these Bylaws, procedure at meetings shall be governed by the provisions of the current edition of Robert's Rules of Order. ARTICLE IX - ELECTIONSSection 1: No Voting by Slates.Candidates for office stand for election as individuals. Ballots shall not take into account or provide for a vote for any candidate to be tied or joined to a vote for any other candidate, except when each of such candidates are running unopposed. Section 2: Election Committee.
Section 3: Nominations.The Secretary shall include in the Annual Meeting notification to the membership of THE DIVISION that nominations are being accepted for each Office open for election. From that time, nominations may be made and submitted to the Secretary for posting on a Division Web site. Brief biographies and statements of goals may also be submitted for each Officer nomination. Nominations for Division Officers may also be made from the floor at the Annual Meeting. Section 4: Elections by Majority.The Officers of THE DIVISION shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast. Section 5: Uncontested Elections.If only one candidate has been nominated for any office, then the candidate for such office shall be certified by the Election Committee as having been unanimously elected. Section 6: Contested Elections.When more than one candidate has been nominated for an office, the Election Committee shall provide for voting by anonymous ballot as follows:
ARTICLE X - AMENDMENTSSection 1: Manner of Making Amendments.These Bylaws may be amended at any Special Meeting of THE DIVISION called for that purpose, by a vote of two-thirds of those present in person or by proxy. Only amendments included in the Notice may be considered at the Special Meeting convened. Voting at such meetings is subject to the provisions of Article III of these Bylaws. Notices of such meetings are subject to the provisions of Article VIII of these Bylaws. Section 2: Effective Date of Amendments.Unless otherwise specified, amendments to these Bylaws shall take effect immediately after their adoption. The amended Bylaws so adopted shall be posted to a Division Web site. Any member who would like to receive a printed copy of the Bylaws by mail may do so by notifying the Secretary. ARTICLE XI - COMPETITIONSSection 1: Qualifying Competitions.Qualifying competitions conducted by THE DIVISION shall be run pursuant to the rules and regulations for fencing competitions promulgated by the USFA. Weapon classifications of fencers for the purpose of ranking competitors in Divisional qualifying competitions shall be the same as those used by the USFA. Subject to these requirements, the Executive Committee of THE DIVISION shall oversee the conditions and restrictions governing the qualifications, entries, seeding and conduct of all qualifying competitions under its jurisdiction. Section 2: Entrance Fees for Qualifying Competitions.Entrance fees for Divisional qualifying competitions conducted by or under the auspices of THE DIVISION shall meet the guidelines set by the Executive Committee for the current season or by special approval from the Executive Committee. Section 3: Sanctioned CompetitionsTHE DIVISION wants to encourage safe, strong, well run competitions under its authority. In order to be a USFA sanctioned competition it shall be necessary to have at least one (1) independent member of the Division Bout Committee, who shall not be affiliated with the club holding the competition, present as chair of the tournament bout committee to certify that the competition complies with all USFA and DIVISION rules and regulations. The competition, if properly conducted, shall then qualify for the purpose of determining weapon classifications. Because of the physical size of THE DIVISION, combined with the large number of clubs and the limited number of members qualified to be part of a tournament bout committee, the following system has been developed to allow all qualified USFA member clubs an equal opportunity to hold a USFA sanctioned competition:
In the event that the number of qualified member clubs in THE DIVISION is significantly reduced during the year, it shall be left to the discretion of the Executive Committee to assign additional competitions in a fair and equitable manner. The Executive Committee shall not be allowed to offer dates to some clubs and not others. All qualified member clubs shall have an equal opportunity to hold additional sanctioned competitions. Section 4: Non-Sanctioned Competitions.All non-sanctioned competitions may be listed in THE DIVISION's schedule of events at the discretion of the Executive Committee. These competitions should follow USFA and DIVISION rules and regulations. However, no classifications can be earned at these non- sanctioned competitions. |
||||
|
|
||||